win diamond earringsfancy colored diamonds colored diamondsfancy colored diamonds yellow diamond jewelryfancy colored diamonds loose pink diamondsfancy colored diamonds engagement rings fancy colored diamonds fancy colored diamonds fancy colored diamonds loose diamonds fancy colored diamonds diamond movies
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 07, 2012, 10:00:20 PM
Home Help Search Calendar recent diamond posts recent posts unread posts Login Register

News: This is the diamond forum for people CRAZY about diamonds. Although, we are heavily into Natural Fancy Colored Diamonds, we love the colorless, white & tinted diamonds as well. SEE FORUM RULES and our PRIVACY POLICY. DIAMONDS BY LAUREN WEBSITE see the FORUM PHOTO GALLERY and NEW ITEMS ON OUR WEBSITE.

See our Database Diamond and Gemstone Catalog.
Our Toll Free Number 1-877-952-8736. International callers 001-212-382-3770.
 
 Become a fan of ours on
diamonds by lauren on facebook


+  coloreddiamond.info
|-+  ABOUT DIAMONDS BY LAUREN
| |-+  Ask about the Rings or Diamonds we offer
| | |-+  Help us choose a setting!
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Help us choose a setting!  (Read 7053 times)
Sanchica27
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1863



« Reply #75 on: July 15, 2010, 11:23:43 AM »

traps traps traps!
Logged

always saving up for my next piece!
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #76 on: July 15, 2010, 02:39:06 PM »

thanks so much for your input everybody!  i need to setup a time with david where me and MIL and he can talk and figure out what she really wants/needs, and what he can do.  though i love trilliants in general, i personally feel like the center stone just feels better with the traps, but the type of band is a big question. 

is it possible to have a three stone ring with these trap sides that would allow a straight band to sit flush against it, or would we have to get a curved band?
Logged
GracefulLion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3941



« Reply #77 on: July 15, 2010, 04:10:08 PM »

I obviously am a fan of trills, and I do think that because of the way they spread out across the finger and taper to a point I think they are very flattering.  BTW, I specifically asked D to have the shank thin and narrowing in towards the trills (I sent pics of what I meant since it is so hard to describe that in words), and I have definitely seen rings with shanks that do the same coming up to the traps.  Traps don't have to mean a thick shank.  No matter what, this will be beautiful!
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #78 on: July 15, 2010, 06:31:24 PM »

Thanks GL, I need to tell that to my MIL.
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #79 on: July 15, 2010, 09:05:55 PM »

AAAAND completely out of left field: anybody think this ring could work with MIL's broad shouldered square??



* lyngg3.JPG (44.14 KB, 600x450 - viewed 40 times.)

* lyngg4.jpg (62.64 KB, 637x450 - viewed 41 times.)

* lyngg6.jpg (39.57 KB, 450x474 - viewed 180 times.)

* lyngg8.JPG (42.75 KB, 600x450 - viewed 45 times.)
Logged
oldmancoyote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3542



« Reply #80 on: July 16, 2010, 04:00:08 AM »

It could, but if your MIL is concerned with a thick shank, it won't work too well. Also, it has no side stones, and I thought you concluded she wanted a 3 stone.
Logged
GracefulLion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3941



« Reply #81 on: July 16, 2010, 09:42:57 AM »

I think that is definitely a look for a round, but anything is possible (says the person who does NOT have to build it...)

Here is a photo of a ring I absolutely love (not mine) with traps and a thin shank...


* three quarter profile.jpg (67.44 KB, 448x326 - viewed 155 times.)

* hand shot kitchen.jpg (18.11 KB, 336x448 - viewed 157 times.)

* gallery.jpg (37.75 KB, 289x269 - viewed 156 times.)
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #82 on: July 16, 2010, 10:17:36 AM »

thanks guys!  good input.
She's pretty set on a three stone, but we were browsing last night and she saw that ring and flipped.  unset, anything is still possible.

GL - Awesome ring! that's totally illustrative of what it is i think my MIL wants!  thanks!
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #83 on: July 22, 2010, 10:47:05 AM »

So we are at a crossroads.  After plotting out this stone's measurements MIL found out that she really wanted something which has more spread across the finger.  So we called up David and he said NP, he would take the stone back and we could start over and as MIL was looking at semi-mounts she came across Namtan's pear and pink split shank and she fell in love. 
So we went to a few B&M to try and figure out what kind of ring she wants again and are back to pave, pave, pave.  But now we may be looking at a white and pink ring, instead of a yellow and white.  Or maybe even Yellow and pink.  Maybe pear, or cushion, or radiant, round isn't even off the table. 
So starting from scratch, with too many options to think about, what would your perfect ring be?
Logged
Trinkette
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7106



« Reply #84 on: July 22, 2010, 11:40:55 AM »

SV, the similarity of the "left field" ring you posted to DBL R3347 (microset 1.71ct FYBrown S12 RB) is remarkable.

Also, as far as fingers and shank styles go, I have relatively medium/shorter fingers and I find DBL rounded shanks to be THE most comfortable for me. Too fat is not good because there is not enough room between my joint and the base of my hand to cram it all in there and still have it look good. OTOH, I find that thin or hard edged, squared-off, shanks are quite uncomfortable and can feel like they are cutting into my skin (some look like it too).

I've tried on a TON of DBL rings, and still, the plain platinum shank on my three-stone brown Glarkler ring (R2121) is THE most comfortable and well balanced ring that I have EVER had the pleasure to wear. However, it is a little weightier than most, and I know that many people prefer a lighter feel.

If it is a micropavé style, then I must add that DBL custom microshanks are incredibly well-made and SMOOTH to the touch. A wonderful feel and a rare treat... (I must acquire one for myself sometime – OINK – LOL)!

Before it was sold, I tried on (errr, actually, wore it around David's office for awhile) DBL split shank halo R1379 (1.51ct L/SI1 cushion in YG) and LOVED it on my hand. It gave me the coverage that I like and yet, the ring still had a lovely light and feminine look. Very flattering to my hand. The ring is one of my all-time favs, and to this day I am sorry I did not nab it when I had the chance.

As far as the perfect ring... for me, anyway, there are WAY too many outstanding choices to choose just one.
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #85 on: July 22, 2010, 01:43:05 PM »

Thanks Trink!  we went to some B&M stores yesterday and she tried on one squared shank with milgraining, engraving, and pave and i think she liked it but when i felt it it was VERY rough.  I didn't even think to bring it up to her though!  Definitely an important point to consider, wearability. 
Logged
clgwli
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2979



« Reply #86 on: July 22, 2010, 02:54:16 PM »

I was wondering why we saw the diamond on the list of rings being made currently.  I am just glad that there wasn't an unhappy reason for you giving it up.

Right now I *think* I want traps much like what was discussed here, but now I am not sure.  I keep seeing such gorgeous halos out there that I keep wavering.  I really do like that pink lemonade semi-mount.  I also love split shanks but I have no idea how it would work with my anniversary band. 

No help am I?

Like you I think I need to go to a jewelry store or two and see what I like.  Better yet, when the time comes I need to fly out to NY myself to just try a bunch of things on there Wink
Logged

Elaine aka Squiggly
elaine@diamondsbylauren.com
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #87 on: July 22, 2010, 03:06:30 PM »

Honestly, I was looking up flight costs last night to NY.  I just don't really have the money, and I can't force my MIL to take the trip.  If money were no object I could just buy the tickets and say "surprise!".  I so want her to see the rings in person though.... there's really not much in town to compare with what David can offer us, so it's hard to get a feel.

Also MIL said maybe she'll fall in love with the ring made from her old stone and she might need to buy it back!  Who knows.  Smiley
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #88 on: July 22, 2010, 08:28:36 PM »

Oh yeah, i forgot to say, when we went to the B&M stores one of the saleswomen told me that:
 "all brown diamonds are included",
"brown diamonds don't get graded with the same scale as fancy colors or whites", and
"$22,000 for a 1.5ct deep brown round INCLUDED center, 18kt pave ring is the true and best price you can get"
and that a clearly faint yellow center was graded "GH" by GIA (not G or H, but GH).
have i mentioned i love David and hate most B&M stores?
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #89 on: July 22, 2010, 08:29:21 PM »

OH!  and that exchanging out that crappy brown round center for a white stone likely "wouldn't add any cost to the ring".  Pshaw.
Logged
clgwli
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2979



« Reply #90 on: July 22, 2010, 08:33:00 PM »

Oye, well I haven't had much luck with B&M stores either.  I am not sure who to even try at this point to see.  Maybe when the time comes for us to reset, I'll be able to swing a $500 whirlwind trip to NY or something.  

One of my favorites was someone who had I think a 1.5-2 carat round pink stone set in a pave type ring with halo (platinum).  I asked if it had any brown in it since it was about $17K IIRC and she said "No, all pink in that stone"

I saw the brown  Roll Eyes

Of course these were the ones who said they couldn't find a radiant in colors I wanted and only RB since radiants are impossible to find but RBs are easy.

Um yeah...

At least trying on even a gemstone ring might give a good feel for what she might like.
Logged

Elaine aka Squiggly
elaine@diamondsbylauren.com
Trinkette
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7106



« Reply #91 on: July 22, 2010, 08:59:09 PM »

 rotflmao
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #92 on: July 22, 2010, 10:18:12 PM »

ha!  yeah another store we visited yesterday said that they only carried rounds and emeralds because those were the only ones people bought/wanted and they were the only diamonds that held their value because all other cuts were basically "irrelevant".  also rounds were the only "brilliant cut" stones and they sparkled more than any other cut because of it.  yay misinformation!
Logged
Trinkette
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7106



« Reply #93 on: July 22, 2010, 10:38:26 PM »

Gosh, too bad about that "irrelevant" cushion-shaped Hope Diamond, and, that silly old pear-shaped Victoria-Transversaal Diamond in the Smithsonian. Ahhh, well.  Roll Eyes
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #94 on: July 22, 2010, 11:38:23 PM »

ha!
Logged
oldmancoyote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3542



« Reply #95 on: July 23, 2010, 01:41:26 AM »

Let's add to the list of irrelevancies:

Tiffany yellow - cushion
Cullinan I - pear
Culllinan II - cushion
Dresden Green - rounded pear (or skewed cushion - you decide)
Koh-i-noor - modified oval brilliant (basically an old miner with some added facets)
Graff Pink - pear
Moussaieff Red - trilliant
Orlov - rose
Portuguese - octagonal (it's almost an Asscher)
Briolette of India - er, briolette (it's possibly the oldest cut diamond in the world)
Condé - rounded pear

...and to top it off, the second most popular cut for "normal" diamonds continues to be the princess cut. I'll be danged if I understand why, but it is.
Logged
clgwli
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2979



« Reply #96 on: July 23, 2010, 06:51:04 AM »

Oh wow what a list of totally irrelevent diamonds out there.  I bet they are worth nearly  nothing Grin
Logged

Elaine aka Squiggly
elaine@diamondsbylauren.com
Trinkette
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7106



« Reply #97 on: July 23, 2010, 09:54:27 AM »

Certainly, they WOULD be worth close to nothing if SV's B&M store marketed them!  Wink
Logged
Trinkette
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7106



« Reply #98 on: July 23, 2010, 10:01:06 AM »

OMC, I too am surprised that the Princess still holds her throne as second from the top. I would have guessed that such a cut would endure, however, not as a front runner above so many others. Seems the Ladies of Brilliant still do rule the land.

Oh, wait, we MUST be incorrect here... after all, according to SV's B&M expert, there is only ONE "brilliant cut" type diamond... Roll Eyes
Logged
SaoriViola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 723



« Reply #99 on: July 23, 2010, 11:02:43 AM »

hahaha, yup, only rounds are "brilliant". 

i'm right there with you guys, princess are almost completely uninteresting to me.  i think Trink's right, brilliance wins over boring, but i also think it's because it's named "princess" and so people think it's royal or something.  all those bridezillas want to be princesses right?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Subscribe to RSS Feed http://coloreddiamond.info/images/rss-icon.jpg