Thanks guys!  For some more idea about perspective and how the halos affect the center:

- The round doesn't have a GIA report, but I had it appraised years back and they gave it a G VS2.  Don't know for sure, but it is very white and eye clean.  Anyway, it measures somewhere around 5.8mm in diameter.

- The middle ring has a Fancy Deep Brownish Yellow cushion center that measures somewhere around 6.8mm sq.  It was 2.08 cts or so.  I sold it when I upgraded to my current 2.83 Y-Z radiant, for which I also traded in my...

- HRH ring on the bottom, which is a 1.58(?) ct Fancy Light Yellow square radiant that measures just over 6.5mm sq.  In that halo the diamond sits up higher in its prongs than the round .80, which is bezeled.  Both halos really show off the centers beautifully.  That lovely ring now resides with Mikla. 

Now I guess I need a new picture with my three current rings - the round one pictured on top here, the Eagle, and my 1.07 ct EC in its pink halo.  The EC is in a totally different type and color of halo and it also looks much much larger than I think one would guess it really is.

Did I mention I am really big fan of halos???

OK, it has been over a month since ah2b asked me to do this, but here is a new picture of my 3 current DBL rings. The details are:

1. .80 G RB in white diamond halo - center measures about 5.8mm 
2. 1.07 F EC in pink diamond halo - center measures about 6.9mm x 5.8mm
3. 2.84 Y-Z radiant with .56 D trills - center measures about 7.5mm x 7.5mm (in defense of this diamond, it is very bright and shiny in person. yet always photographs cloudy.  Not sure if it has fluor - could that be the cause?  Anyone?)

Have you made a decision Saori?

SV- Great plan!

Good question GL.

I remember that with DW's first yellow. She steamed it with her Jet steamer and it was still cloudy. The other diamonds, including her brown, always come out super sparkly.

Here's a picture to show you. This was taken after a cleaning.  I don't mean to thread jack here, but should yellows be cleaned differently D? I know that ultrasonic cleaners shouldn't be used because of the melee--right?

We could never get the yellow as "clear" as the first time we removed it from the DBL box.

is that true about the ultrasonic?  i've had my engagement ring for over two years and have cleaned it in the ultrasonic cleaner probably once a week or more since then.  once, about 8 months ago or so i noticed one of the micropave stones had come a little loose so i took it to a local jeweler to secure it.  other than that i've never had any problems.

Sorry I am tardy to the party.  I like the split shank/halo ring.  I think that would make it pop.  That is a fabulous stone btw. 

Hi guys!  So which sides do you guys think?

yay!  thanks ah2.

I like them both almost equally.  I have recently decided that I want traps for my stone some day so I am not sure if my wants are influencing my decision.  I just like the idea of a slightly wider shank whre the traps flow right into it if that makes sense.

Either will be lovely though.

good point squiggly, my MIL has shorter fingers and so has wanted a narrower band which i think is most flattering for her, so she's concerned the traps make the band too thick.  it's also one of the reasons she focused on trilliant sides, but also 'cause she really likes them. 
so she was up late last night looking at styles, if it were traps, what do you guys think of this?

I really like both traps and trills and think that the pave' is lovely on a 3 stone ring.  

I previously owned a DBL yellow radiant and trill ring and it was really gorgeous in person-really fluid lines and I probably wouldn't have chose trills had I only seen them in a layout as above.  

Trills. Plain band. Or at least, that's what I'd do.